|
|
@@ -10,197 +10,20 @@
|
|
|
<a name="0-intro"></a>
|
|
|
<landing-page></landing-page>
|
|
|
|
|
|
- <!-- TODO: <div class="page">
|
|
|
- <a name="1-foresight"></a><h1 class="pl-2">Regional Foresight</h1> -->
|
|
|
- <!--
|
|
|
-A short note on the POLIRURAL project as a host for 12 regional Foresight initiatives.
|
|
|
+<about-rural-attractiveness-explorer></about-rural-attractiveness-explorer>
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Links to FS related project deliverables
|
|
|
-Links to newsletter and related articles
|
|
|
-Links to internal deliverables (inventories, guides, compendia etc.)
|
|
|
-Links to the 12 Foresight pages
|
|
|
-Links to external pages for FUP
|
|
|
- -->
|
|
|
- <!-- </div> -->
|
|
|
+<text-mining></text-mining>
|
|
|
|
|
|
- <!-- TODO: <div class="page">
|
|
|
- <a name="2-text-mining"></a><h1 class="pl-2">Text Mining applied to Regional Foresight</h1> -->
|
|
|
- <!--
|
|
|
-A short text explaining TM, its application to Foresight, and the work done on TM in the POLIRURAL project.
|
|
|
+<system-dynamics-modelling></system-dynamics-modelling>
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Links to TM related project deliverables
|
|
|
-Links to newsletter and related articles
|
|
|
-Links to CKA paper and PPT for ISPIM Copenhagen meeting in June22
|
|
|
-Link to the “The Semantic Explorer”
|
|
|
+<policy-options-explorer></policy-options-explorer>
|
|
|
|
|
|
- -->
|
|
|
- <!-- </div> -->
|
|
|
+<rural-attractiveness-explorer></rural-attractiveness-explorer>
|
|
|
|
|
|
- <!-- TODO: <div class="page">
|
|
|
- <a name="3-sdm"></a><h1 class="pl-2">System Dynamic Modelling applied to Regional Foresight</h1> -->
|
|
|
- <!--
|
|
|
-A short text explaining
|
|
|
-SDM, Its application to Foresight, and the work done on TM in the POLIRURAL project.
|
|
|
-The 3-layer model
|
|
|
-The 8-module master model
|
|
|
+<comparing-rural-attractiveness></comparing-rural-attractiveness>
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Links to TM related project deliverables
|
|
|
-Links to newsletter and related articles
|
|
|
-Links to POLIRURAL paper with Milos et al...
|
|
|
-Link to page 4 entitled “The Policy Options Explorer”
|
|
|
-Link to page 5 entitled “The Rural Attractiveness Explorer”
|
|
|
--->
|
|
|
- <!-- </div> -->
|
|
|
+<exploring-dynamics></exploring-dynamics>
|
|
|
|
|
|
- <div class="page">
|
|
|
- <a name="4-policy-options"></a>
|
|
|
- <h1 class="pl-2">The Policy Options Explorer</h1>
|
|
|
- <p>The starting point for all the pilot’s models was PoliRural SDM ed.3. Then, a series of meetings with those
|
|
|
- responsible for the pilots were scheduled. The aim of the meetings was in the first place to fully explain the
|
|
|
- model so that pilots could understand the dynamics explained and the assumptions made. In the second place, the
|
|
|
- meetings were designed to best fit local dynamics into the template model.</p>
|
|
|
- <p>After the first round of meetings, a period was open for pilots to gather data. This period was open to
|
|
|
- clarification to find the best proxies, and discussion about qualitative data collection.</p>
|
|
|
- <p>Finally, the calibration was intended with the available data.</p>
|
|
|
- <figure>
|
|
|
- <img src="{{assetsPath}}policy-options-explorer.png" class="img-fluid">
|
|
|
- <figcaption>Policy options explorer</figcaption>
|
|
|
- </figure>
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- <!--
|
|
|
-Links to SDM related project deliverables
|
|
|
-Links to newsletter and related articles
|
|
|
-Link to the “The Policy Options Explorer” (pages of Runar and Antoni, or separate links for each region)
|
|
|
- -->
|
|
|
- </div>
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- <div class="page">
|
|
|
- <a name="5-attractiveness"></a>
|
|
|
- <h1 class="pl-2">The Rural Attractiveness Explorer</h1>
|
|
|
- <p>In PoliRural, we observed that concepts of rural attractiveness often feature in regional development strategies,
|
|
|
- that they differ significantly from region to region, and are conditioned by developmental priorities such as the
|
|
|
- desire to attract investors, entrepreneurs, or tourists. Thus, what is understood as rural attractiveness may
|
|
|
- depend on where, when, and by whom attractiveness is
|
|
|
- determined Additionally, the attractiveness of a region can be determined only in comparison to other regions.
|
|
|
- This means that a region that is rather attractive compared to one set of regions can be rather unattractive
|
|
|
- compared to another set of regions. Due to this complexity, measuring and evaluating rural attractiveness is
|
|
|
- challenging.</p>
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- <p>Nevertheless, there is some common understanding of and agreement on the general issues that matter for rural
|
|
|
- attractiveness. These are aspects belonging to the following areas:</p>
|
|
|
- <ul>
|
|
|
- <li>social,</li>
|
|
|
- <li>natural environment,</li>
|
|
|
- <li>human-made environment,</li>
|
|
|
- <li>economic,</li>
|
|
|
- <li>institutional,</li>
|
|
|
- <li>cultural.</li>
|
|
|
- </ul>
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- <p>This minimum agreement provided the basis for the development of a <strong>Rural Attractiveness Index</strong>.
|
|
|
- This index is made
|
|
|
- up of 6 sub-indices - one sub-index for each of the generally relevant areas mentioned above. Each of the
|
|
|
- sub-indices includes a number of sub-sub indices, e.g. the social sub-index could include sub-sub indices
|
|
|
- measuring the age composition or unemployment rate of the population in a region.
|
|
|
- The Rural Attractiveness Index reflects the characteristics of the concept of rural attractiveness: The values of
|
|
|
- the Index do not represent absolute estimates of the attractiveness of a region but reflect how attractive the
|
|
|
- assessed regions are in comparison to each other. To account for the context dependency of rural attractiveness,
|
|
|
- the concrete choice of sub-sub indices needs to be determined in each individual situation in which rural
|
|
|
- attractiveness is supposed to be evaluated.</p>
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- <p>With the Rural Attractiveness Explorer, we want to enable users to explore the effects of different policy
|
|
|
- choices on the rural attractiveness of the PoliRural pilot regions. Thus, we represent the outputs of the Policy
|
|
|
- Explorer as a value of the Rural Attractiveness Index and visualise the results of that in different ways. For
|
|
|
- this purpose, we adapted the Rural Attractiveness Index to fit with the Policy Options Explorer as follows
|
|
|
- (notably, the version of the Rural Attractiveness Index used here consists of only 4 instead of 6 sub-indices):
|
|
|
- <figure>
|
|
|
- <img src="{{assetsPath}}rai-composition.png" class="img-fluid">
|
|
|
- <figcaption>Composition of the Rural Attractiveness Index used in the Rural Attractiveness Explorer</figcaption>
|
|
|
- </figure>
|
|
|
- </p>
|
|
|
- <!--
|
|
|
-Links to RA related project deliverables
|
|
|
-Links to relevant newsletter and related articles
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-Link to page 6 entitled “Comparing Rural Attractiveness across the regions of Europe”
|
|
|
-Link to page 7 entitled “Exploring the Dynamics of Rural Attractiveness”
|
|
|
-Link to page 8 entitled “Exploring the Impact of Policy Option on Rural Attractiveness”
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- -->
|
|
|
- </div>
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- <div class="page">
|
|
|
- <a name="6-comparing-europe"></a>
|
|
|
- <h1 class="pl-2">Comparing Rural Attractiveness across the regions of Europe</h1>
|
|
|
- <!--
|
|
|
-A short text introducing the idea of comparing rural attractiveness across the regions of Europe.
|
|
|
- -->
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- <p><a href="https://publish.lesprojekt.cz/attractiveness-clustering/" target="_blank">Map visualization for all
|
|
|
- regions</a></p>
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- <!-- TODO: Link to map visualization for the project regions and its evolution over time
|
|
|
- <div class="map-row">
|
|
|
- <h2>Map-based comparison</h2>
|
|
|
- <hslayers-map></hslayers-map>
|
|
|
- </div>
|
|
|
- -->
|
|
|
- <p>A ‘dots’ visualization for the project regions and its evolution over time</p>
|
|
|
- <all-in-one-graph></all-in-one-graph>
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- <p>A ‘disc’ visualization for the project regions and its evolution over time</p>
|
|
|
- <year-graph></year-graph>
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- <!--
|
|
|
-TODO: Link to ‘data race’ visualization for the project regions and its evolution over time
|
|
|
- -->
|
|
|
- </div>
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- <div class="page">
|
|
|
- <a name="7-dynamics"></a>
|
|
|
- <h1 class="pl-2">Exploring the Dynamics of Rural Attractiveness</h1>
|
|
|
- <!--
|
|
|
-A short text introducing the idea of exploring the dynamics of rural attractiveness by drilling into the sub-indices
|
|
|
- -->
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- <p>A ‘dots’ visualization of sub-indices for the regions and their evolution over time</p>
|
|
|
- <div class="card">
|
|
|
- <h2>Detailed overview of individual regions</h2>
|
|
|
- <div class="card-body">
|
|
|
- <p>An aggregated attractiveness index is composed of six factors: anthropic, cultural, economic, institutional,
|
|
|
- natural and social. Due to the incompleteness of data provided by different regions, we only present four of
|
|
|
- them below.</p>
|
|
|
- <ng-container *ngFor="let region of sdmDihService.regions; last as isLast">
|
|
|
- <region-graph [region]="region"></region-graph>
|
|
|
- <hr *ngIf="!isLast">
|
|
|
- </ng-container>
|
|
|
- </div>
|
|
|
- </div>
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- <p>A ‘disc’ visualization of sub-indices for the regions and their evolution over time</p>
|
|
|
- <factor-year-graph></factor-year-graph>
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- <!--
|
|
|
-TODO: Link to ‘data race’ visualization of sub-indices for the regions and their evolution over time
|
|
|
- -->
|
|
|
- </div>
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- <div class="page">
|
|
|
- <a name="8-impacts"></a>
|
|
|
- <h1 class="pl-2">Exploring the Impact of Policy Option on Rural Attractiveness</h1>
|
|
|
- <!--
|
|
|
-A short text introducing the idea of exploring the impact of policy options on rural attractiveness, based on comparing the impact of different scenarios in each of three domains, for a single region
|
|
|
-Infrastructure (roads and broadband coverage)
|
|
|
-Agricultural policy
|
|
|
-Support for Entrepreneurship
|
|
|
- -->
|
|
|
- <!-- Link to ‘disc’ visualization of impact of different options on RA for each domain -->
|
|
|
- <p>A ‘disc’ visualization of impact of different options on RAI and its sub-indices for each domain</p>
|
|
|
- <scenario-factor-year-graph></scenario-factor-year-graph>
|
|
|
- <!--
|
|
|
-TODO: Link to ‘data-race’ visualization of impact of different options on RA for each domain
|
|
|
-TODO: Link to ‘data-race’ visualization of impact of different options on sub-indices for each domain
|
|
|
- -->
|
|
|
- </div>
|
|
|
+<exploring-impact></exploring-impact>
|
|
|
|
|
|
</main>
|